![]() ![]() ![]() This is mostly the result of optimization in a handful of very common operations. Yes, even windows resize slightly faster. Animations have fewer frames, and therefore complete faster. There are far fewer "uncomfortable pauses" in the UI. It's as if the cobwebs have been removed from the OS. I am hard-pressed to find any part of the user interface that does not feel noticeably faster in Panther than it does in Jaguar. As far as the user experience is concerned, if it "feels slow," it is slow. ![]() Panther itself is built with gcc 3.3, so there you go.īut "perceived performance" is where Mac OS X has always suffered. ![]() Panther wins these mostly on a technicality: gcc 3.3 produces more optimized code, and can better leverage the G5. First, there's the boring, old world of numerical performance. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |